by Paula Bosse
This “portable darkroom” is nothing if not eye-catching. The illustration accompanied a short article in the December, 1924 issue of Popular Mechanics.
I’d be a little concerned about the heady cocktail of chemicals wafting around inside that rubber hood — there must have been some sort of opening to allow the fumes to escape. Still, it sounds a little better than an earlier portable darkroom from 1911, invented by an unnamed “Illinoisan,” which also was part-hood, but the hood on this one tied around the neck (!):
Another portable darkroom. from 1907, below, did not have the fetishistic trappings of rubber or a hood — it had roomier cloth “walls” which tied around the user’s waist. (AND it had a “ventilating tube.”)
Here’s another one along similar lines which was put into use during World War I:
But back to the hoods. Read the patent submission from 1887 by Isaac Griscom of Woodbury, New Jersey for his “Portable Dark-Room” here. It seems very similar to the one featured in Popular Mechanics almost 40 years later.
I hope those hooded photographers were not overcome by the fumes in such a tight space. This Griscom detail looks like a befuddled character from an Edward Gorey book who has found himself somehow entangled in his overcoat. But since it was meant to depict a photographer at work, mixing chemicals and developing plates, I’ll just silently hope he’s not at the precipice of unconsciousness. …He’s probably okay — he’s still standing. …For now.
Sources & Notes
That top image is really strange-looking — I can’t help but think of the creepy images from Victorian photography in which mothers “hid” themselves in photos of their children by disguising themselves as furniture or drapery (see some of those fantastically odd examples here).
Check out a really great illustrated article, “The Portable Darkroom,” on the Battle Born Historical Photography site, here.
Copyright © 2019 Paula Bosse. All Rights Reserved.